April 22, 2021 House of Trust

Rethink the EPF Withdrawal Scheme

As part of the revised economic stimulus package, Employees Provident Fund contributors under the age of 55 are allowed to withdraw up to RM500 per month from Account 2 for 12 months for the purchase of essential items and for payment of bills and rentals.

Along with the government’s decision to reduce EPF contribution by 4% beginning April 2020, this scheme aims to boost private consumption and cushion the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Malaysian economy. In fact, this i-Lestari Account 2 Withdrawal Scheme is expected to benefit more than 12 million EPF members with a total withdrawal of about RM40 billion. 

However, we strongly believe that this measure is not the right direction to take as part of the economic stimulus package. 

First, the majority of Malaysians needing assistance in these difficult times are those with lower savings in their EPF account. A monthly withdrawal will result in the loss of annual and compounded dividends in the long run. This will eventually deplete the long-term savings of the most vulnerable from  low-income communities. 

Source: Financial Education Network Report 2019

Statistically, 68% of EPF members do not achieve the minimum basic savings requirement of RM240,000 at age 55. More worryingly, about 20% enter retirement with less than RM10,000 in savings. With the lower contribution rate of 7% and a monthly withdrawal of RM500, a substantial number of Malaysians will be in grave financial danger after retirement. 

Second, many Malaysians will not be able to benefit from this withdrawal scheme as they do not have active EPF accounts. In fact, 62% of some 22 million working-age Malaysians are self-employed and not covered by any formal social protection. How then will they fend for themselves as a result of the loss of income during the Movement Control Order (MCO)? 

Source: KWSP Social Protection Insight

A 2019 Financial Education Network Report reveals that 52% of Malaysians face difficulties to raise even RM1,000 for emergencies. More alarmingly, only 24% of Malaysians are able to sustain living expenses for at least 3 months if they lose their source of income. In times of economic uncertainty with more Malaysians being retrenched, how can the government expect Malaysians to bail themselves out and stimulate the economy with their old-age savings? 

Source: Financial Education Network Report 2019

Globally, expecting workers to dig into their own savings to stimulate the economy is a very rare measure. On the contrary, other governments in the world have chosen direct payments, cash grants and business subsidies among others. For instance, Hong Kong is giving HKD10,000 (USD1280, RM5720) in cash to all 7 million permanent residents to boost its recession-hit economy. Australia is giving a one-off AUD750 (USD 444, RM1970) to 6.5 million lower-income Australians, aimed at boosting domestic demand. The Government of Denmark told private companies hit by the effects of the pandemic that it would pay 75% of their employees’ salaries to avoid mass layoffs. 

Indeed, leading economists internationally are calling for governments to act fast and do whatever it takes to fight the economic fallout. Specifically, governments will need to reduce personal and corporate bankruptcies and ensure people have money to keep spending even if they’re not working. This helps in avoiding deep, long-lasting damage to economies. 

Besides that, economic evidence has shown that the most optimal method to ensure people spend to stimulate the economy, as well as to safeguard their welfare, is to basically put more cash in their hands. Apart from the current RM600 for workers forced to go on unpaid leave and RM300 for Bantuan Sara Hidup recipients, much more needs to be given out to help Malaysians stay afloat. 

It is important to remember that Malaysia still has the fiscal space to do ‘whatever it takes’ to rescue Malaysians and save the economy. As evidence, our fiscal deficit is around 3.4%, relatively lower than 7% in 2009 during the global financial crisis. 

Yes, much moral courage is needed to use whatever savings held in trust by many Malaysian Institutions, to pump money directly into the economy. As such, we wait eagerly for the more comprehensive economic stimulus package on March 30. But until then, we urge the government to reconsider this EPF Account 2 Withdrawal Scheme. 

*Benedict Weerasena is an Economist at Bait Al Amanah (House of Trust) 

*Abdul Razak Ahmad, PhD is the Founding Director of Bait Al Amanah (House of Trust) 

**This article has been published in the Malaysian Reserve and The Iskandarian

Related Posts

Ekspo Johor Berkemajuan Jadi Tumpuan Rakyat

January 17, 2018

January 17, 2018

Gambar dipetik daripada halaman facebook rasmi Ekspo Johor Berkemajuan 2017 Bermula 9 hingga 14 Oktober 2017 yang lalu, Dataran Mahkota,...

BRT Menjadi Pilihan Iskandar Malaysia

January 29, 2018

January 29, 2018

BRT atau Bas Rapid Transit merupakan pengangkutan awam pertama di Malaysia yang menggunakan teknologi mesra alam. Sistem pengangkutan BRT laluan...

Social Mobility Index 2020

February 3, 2020

February 3, 2020

In January 2020, the World Economic Forum created a new index to measure social mobility, broadly defined as the ability...

Advancing the Silver Economy

April 29, 2019

April 29, 2019

I HAD a conversation with my mum recently over an elderly friend, technology, and getting on with life in this...

Pesan kepada Umno untuk 2020

December 18, 2019

December 18, 2019

TAHUN 2019 bakal melabuhkan tirainya. Tahun hadapan, bermulalah dekad baharu bagi kalendar Gregorian. Bersamanya juga tiba seribu satu perubahan tatakelola...

Global Economy in Transition

January 28, 2019

January 28, 2019

Prosperity. Sustainability. Security. All rely on global economic cooperation, so how can we can we shape a more equitable and...

Media Statement: Budget 2020 Roundtable Dialogue

September 18, 2019

September 18, 2019

The Bipartisan Budget 2020 Roundtable Dialogue with the Theme “United We Tack to Avoid Potential Recession” was successfully held on...

Panellist Update “Kashmir in Perspective: The Prospect for Peace and Democracy”

February 8, 2021

February 8, 2021

We are excited to announce the panelist line up for “Kashmir in Perspective: The Prospect for Peace and Democracy”, a...

Malaysian Economic Monitor (December 2018)

December 18, 2018

December 18, 2018

On 18th December 2018, the latest edition of World Bank’s Malaysian Economic Monitor on ‘Realising Human Potential’ was launched at...

Ucapan Belanjawan 2020 Parlimen Malaysia

October 31, 2019

October 31, 2019

Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob (BN-Bera) dalam Ucapan Ketua Pembangkang telah mengutarakan ketiadaan peruntukan untuk projek berimpak tinggi...

Top 18 Achievements of Johor

January 30, 2018

January 30, 2018

Johor’s economic growth surpassed the recorded rates for Malaysia each year from 2011 to 2016, with an average of 5.9%...

FELDA di Landasan Betul

January 17, 2018

January 17, 2018

“Tan Sri Shahrir Abdul Samad, ikon politik yang berwibawa dan disegani. Perjuangannya, peribadinya dan khidmat baktinya adalah cerminan dan terjemahan...

Kepentingan pindaan Akta Kualiti Alam Sekeliling 1974: Forum Halatuju Isu Pencemaran Pasir Gudang

September 19, 2019

September 19, 2019

Akta Kualiti Alam Sekeliling 1974 perlu dipinda bagi menangani kejadian pencemaran di negara ini khususnya seperti yang berlaku di Sungai...

Economic Outlook 2019

December 19, 2018

December 19, 2018

The Fiscal and Economics Division of the Ministry of Finance Malaysia recently released the Economic Outlook 2019. Here are a...

FMT Article: Relook how Malaysia measures poverty, say academics at Urban Poverty Webinar

April 16, 2021

April 16, 2021

By Imran Ariff, Reporter of Free Malaysia Today The way Malaysia measures poverty must be changed to take into account...

Comments
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *